|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 85 post(s) |
kiu Nakamura
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
23
|
Posted - 2015.06.16 04:17:14 -
[1] - Quote
Bug report I
https://gist.github.com/kiu/4ee1060a0174d6915343 |
kiu Nakamura
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
23
|
Posted - 2015.06.16 17:09:06 -
[2] - Quote
SilentAsTheGrave wrote:Constantly having alliance tournament ship, faction fit pirate battleships and 100 ISK triage carriers dropping on me left and right doesn't exactly feel realistic. No way to curb it down a bit before the thing starts?
I think this just levels the playing field a bit. Even if it were real ISK market values, entities like BL could still do the same thing (as they likely have almost unlimited funds) while all the younger alliances participating in the event don't have a huge wallet to begin with.
You can already see how people throw their Titans on field - which should be a very limited resource - not caring about losses because they got enough of them.
A proper test would have been, remove all assets from everyone, give every player x amount of isk, set all prices to a fixed value, disable isk generation (insurance, bounties, etc) and get everyone started.
|
kiu Nakamura
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
23
|
Posted - 2015.06.16 17:42:00 -
[3] - Quote
Maybe my earlier post got ignored as it was a link.
Bug report / Feedback
IHUB IHUB is not recognized as being in 9uy. It is there in space, belongs to brave holdings, but the UI insists on that another IHUB can be deployed. When you try to deploy another ihub, you get a message that there is already an IHUB. Enemies can actually entosis the IHUB, but after repairing that, the IHUB is still not recognized.
Station management The button for station management in the Offices list, sometimes doesnt show up. Need to redock to see that button.
Command Nodes Command Nodes do not show up on DSCAN or Probe Scan even though the devblog says otherwise.
Move HQ Could not move our HQ due to: "SEC regards the location you are in as being part of a territorial dispute. SEC rulesforbid HQs of corporations being created in or relocated to disputed territories. Due to this you can not move your HQ here." Even though we own the station and have a TCU in 9uy. Guess this is coupled to outdated SOV mechanics?
iHub Ownership When we placed and entosist an iHub, it got registered as being owned by the Exec Corp even though the person doing the Entosis is not part of the exec corp, he is member of a different alliance corp. Is this intentional? Can we transfer ihub ownerships somehow?
TCU We had a TCU and iHub at Planet I in 9uy (the one with the broken ihub). The TCU was fully functional and claimed BRAVE. I passed by and scooped it into my cargo. Why was I able to scoop it even though I am not int he owning Exec Corp? That did nothing to the system, it was still claimed to BRAVE. There was no notification about TCU loss. Then I tried to deploy it again at the exact same location and got an error (I believe notAPlanet?). Once downtime hit, the system got marked as unclaimed. I moved to a different planet, and there I could deploy it without a problem.
Vulnerability Window Not sure where the option is hidden to configure the vulnerability window? Or where we can define a system being the Designated Capital System?
Steam Is there an option for Steam users to get on Duality?
TCU II Even though a systen is unclaimed (no active TCU), the UI (upper left corner) and Solarsystem Show Info shows a vuln window for the TCU.
TCU III Redeployed the previously scooped TCU and entosist it. No notification. And for me the system was marked as unclaimed (for others it correctly switched to being claimed as brave). This fixed itself once I did a session change. |
kiu Nakamura
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
23
|
Posted - 2015.06.17 00:21:21 -
[4] - Quote
Blue Ice wrote:please name command nodes A B C D etc.
e.g. 9UY4-H Station Command Node A
or any way to differentiate them.
Or fix them so they show up on the probe results (see above in my bugreport) so they have a unique ID. |
kiu Nakamura
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
24
|
Posted - 2015.06.17 13:40:18 -
[5] - Quote
Thanks for the extensive reply.
kiu Nakamura wrote:Station managementThe button for station management in the Offices list, sometimes doesnt show up. Need to redock to see that button. CCP Lebowski wrote: I haven't been able to reproduce this issue myself, if you see it again could you please submit a bug report in client (F12->Report Bug) and I'll investigate further.
Bug report sent on Duality. May be related to waking up after being podded.
kiu Nakamura wrote:Command NodesCommand Nodes do not show up on DSCAN or Probe Scan even though the devblog says otherwise. CCP Lebowski wrote: This will be resolved for dscan, adding this to the known issues.
What about Probe Scans as mentioned in the devblog? I would have guessed each one gets its own ID in there and can be identified that way?
CCP Lebowski wrote:This is correct, you've never been able to move your corporate HQ to a location you could get locked out of for obvious reasons
I am so bad at this game, lol.
|
kiu Nakamura
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
24
|
Posted - 2015.06.17 14:16:53 -
[6] - Quote
kiu Nakamura wrote:Vulnerability WindowNot sure where the option is hidden to configure the vulnerability window? Or where we can define a system being the Designated Capital System? CCP Lebowski wrote: Both are configured in the Home Sub tab of the Alliance tab in the Corporation window. (Expand the settled systems section to see the options for capital system assignment).
The Designated Capital UI seems to be buggy, see https://community.eveonline.com/support/bug-reports/my-bug-reports/details?issueId=EBR-39925
|
kiu Nakamura
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
24
|
Posted - 2015.06.17 14:19:28 -
[7] - Quote
Taurkinius wrote:This is rather inefficient from an alliance leadership standpoint, as being able to view all of my alliance's sov indices at a glance is going to be a large part of how we work in the new sov system.
Also it is important to get a glance of enemies indices as well :)
But I assume, once there is an API endpoint to extract this data, everyone will look it up on Dotlan or their own alliance tools amyway.
|
kiu Nakamura
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
25
|
Posted - 2015.06.17 15:15:51 -
[8] - Quote
I assume this hasn't been enabled yet, but shouldn't our designated capital system have an adjusted Defense Multiplier (not 1.0)?
And shouldn't the Sovereignity Tab on Show Info indicate somewhere that this is a capital?
|
kiu Nakamura
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
26
|
Posted - 2015.06.17 18:21:55 -
[9] - Quote
CCP Lebowski wrote:This is a fair point and we've been discussing it in Five 0 today. As of now we're undecided whether this will be something we address in the initial release, in a later iteration, or leave it to be something exposed through CREST that others can address themselves in their alliance tools.
Please, make this a release blocker. Think of the emergent gameplay not happening. If there is no mechanism whatsoever (have a CREST endpoint and you are good to go), there will be the need for recon teams to burn their time, collecting this data manually on a regular basis. Don't hurt them even more :)
|
kiu Nakamura
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
27
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 20:08:44 -
[10] - Quote
Can we donate some SSDs to make that rebooting faster? |
|
kiu Nakamura
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
28
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 21:36:21 -
[11] - Quote
Uninitialized systems dont show the Invuln time window in Show Info unless at least one character entered that system (traffic control loading the system). http://i.imgur.com/J5WSs5F.png
Is there any reason why the invuln window in Show info shows a date and not only a time?
|
kiu Nakamura
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
28
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 21:42:54 -
[12] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:kiu Nakamura wrote:Is there any reason why the invuln window in Show info shows a date and not only a time?
It's for debug purposes, in case something breaks and the vulnerability doesn't correctly happen every day. The text there will be changed before release.
Makes sense. I assume the current time is displayed for debugging purposes as well? |
kiu Nakamura
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
28
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 14:51:59 -
[13] - Quote
Shameless plug for people in need of calculating entosis times: http://entosis.501gu.de
|
kiu Nakamura
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
30
|
Posted - 2015.06.20 15:57:22 -
[14] - Quote
klana depp wrote:yesterday we decided to just give up because it was too boring to wait for 43 minutes doing nothing.
If you don't want to invest 43m to conquer space on your behalf, you dont want that space in the first place. SCNR. |
kiu Nakamura
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
31
|
Posted - 2015.06.20 21:13:26 -
[15] - Quote
Gabriel Karade wrote:Q: I drop an Ihub, it appears as 'Concord' = I have to Entosis my own Ihub??
In the current system you need to anchor and then online stuff. In the new system you throw it in space and entosis it. Not that different? |
kiu Nakamura
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
31
|
Posted - 2015.06.21 17:07:23 -
[16] - Quote
Jayne Fillon wrote:Regardless, in the end this isn't about balancing, it's about testing the sov.
That would have been correct if the thing would have been sold as a test. But it is a competition for some reason. And everyone in eve already knows how it will end. PL will win and smug about having their name on the module for the next years.
It is really disappointing to see how CCP failed on setting this up (even though they put so much work in it, it is appreciated), the winner seems to be determined by who-piled-the-most-super-assets-as-their-alliance-exists-since-the-stone-age.
|
kiu Nakamura
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
31
|
Posted - 2015.06.21 17:33:24 -
[17] - Quote
kiu Nakamura wrote:That would have been correct if the thing would have been sold as a test. But it is a competition for some reason.
Jayne Fillon wrote:The wargame is a test, run on Duality... a test server.
Maybe you take a look at this forum post title. "sovereignity playtest COMPETITION". It was sold by CCP as a competition not as a Sisi Masstest.
Jayne Fillon wrote:I agree about the supers thing, but really, supers aren't nearly as valuable in this new system.
Have you been on Duality? Supers are OP killing everyone.
|
|
|
|